![]()
| ||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
| Native American Child HealthHome | Awards | Locum Tenens | Activities | Resources | Reach Out & ReadOral HealthDiscussion Summary Date
of Discussion: July 2003 Consensus: Dental decay in Native children is a huge problem cited by all participants (80-90% in White River, 80% in Northern Quebec, 90% where Steve is..). Availability of Dentists: The ability to get a child in to dental visits seems to vary dramatically by site. Some are seen when they get first tooth and then every 6 months, while other sites children aren't seen intil they are 3. Various sites mentioned a distinct paucity of dentists. Some sites (Puyallup) automatically refers all pregnant mothers to a dentist for an evaluation. Primary Care Providers looking at teeth: It seems all sites have providers who recognize the problem and do look at a child's teeth routinely. We didn't raise the issue of how well we examine teeth and document problems. Interventions: 1. Education: many sites have
providers, WIC staff, dental staff, others educating families about the infectious
nature of caries, juice, propping, brushing, bottles until 12 months only. Steve
shared sobering impression that all their education interventions had no impact
on incidence or severity and so they went to varnish. |
|
| ||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| ||||||