![]()
| ||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
PROS Pearls: · During well child visits with children ages 2 to 11 years, providers reported discussing the topics of car restraints, nutrition, dental care, and reading aloud most often (72%-93%). In addition, the topics of regular exercise (52%), firearms (52%) and media use (59%) were discussed at least half of the time. · The age of the child influenced the topics discussed during the well child visit. Providers discussed more often the topics of discipline and storing medicines for children ages 2-5 but the topics of TV/computer games, bike helmets, regular exercise, smoking around children, guns and family fights for children ages 6-11. · Concordance between parent and provider was high for all topics (72%-90%) immediately after the visit. Parents reported a mean of 6.33 (SD 2.9) topics discussed compared to the providers' reported mean of 6.9 (SD 2.7) topics. Parents recalled more topics than the provider reported when the number of topics was low (1-4 topics), while the least discrepancy between the reports existed when a medium number of topics was discussed (5-8 topics). However, parent recall dwindles when provider discusses nine or more topics. Even though parents demonstrated good recall one month later compared with their postvisit reports, the same pattern emerged regarding parent recall and provider reporting depending on number of topics. · The findings suggest that limiting the number of topics discussed, rather than attempting to squeeze more informational content into the visit, might lead to increased retention, a necessary starting point for behavior change. |
These were among the findings from the AAP's practice-based research network - Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS) and its first large-scale intervention study, which examined the effectiveness of an office-based intervention where practitioners used brief, easy-to-use patient education tools to promote positive child health and development. Overall, 203 practitioners participated in data collection, distributed throughout 125 practices and 27 states, Canada, and Puerto Rico. Patients were eligible for inclusion in the study if they 1) were between 2-11 years old; 2) were accompanied by a primary caregiver for a well child visit; 3) had a working telephone where they could be reached for the next 6-12 months; and 4) had parents who were able to complete the surveys in English or Spanish. Data were collected on 4,890 patients between August 2002 and December 2005. Funding was provided by Grant RO1 HD42260 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development/Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Additional funding was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the AAP's Friends of Children.
The citation for this first manuscript is as follows:
Barkin SL, Scheindlin B, Brown C, Ip E, Finch S, Wasserman RC. Anticipatory Guidance Topics: Are More Better? Ambulatory Pediatrics 2005; 5(6): 372-376.
Manuscript writing continues.
| Core support for the PROS network is provided by a grant from the Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health Bureau | ![]() |
About PROS | Study
Updates | Join PROS | Network
News Excerpts
PROS Bibliography | Funding
Sources | PROS Home Page
Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS)
American Academy of Pediatrics
141 Northwest Point Blvd
PO Box 927
Elk Grove Village, IL 60009-0927
800/433-9016, ext. 7623
|
© COPYRIGHT AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | Site Map | Contact Us | Privacy Statement | About Us | Home |
|
American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Blvd., Elk Grove Village, IL, 60007, 847-434-4000 |